Beyond The Passion of The Christ and Bella: A Few Ideas For Catholic Movies
11/20/07
Some people were hoping that Mel Gibson would plow the hundreds of millions he made from The Passion of The Christ
into making more movies that suit the desires and tastes of Catholic
and Christian filmgoers. I remember reading one wish that Mr. Gibson
would turn his attention to filming a life of St. Francis.
However I think that The Passion,
the scenes of which many, including myself, now recall when we meditate
on the Sorrowfuland Mysteries and Stations, is Mel's final contribution
to the Catholic film library. He's probably a drunkard and a drunken
hero is usually a worthless one. He's afraid of the film establishment
and the Neocons. He knows that there's a difference between a Christian
movie and a Catholic movie and that while Christians may go ga-ga over
a Christian movie, they'll dismiss a Catholic movie as vomit of the
Whore of Babylon.
Also
most Catholics couldn't care less about Catholic movies. Or other
Catholic creative endeavors. And the people with the money to make
Catholic movies, including Mel Gibson, expect to make more money on
their ventures and don't understand that some things are worth doing
even if they are not profitable.
That there are
more Christians interested in Christian movies than there are Catholics
interested in Catholic movies is why the recent movie Bella was pushed as a "Christian" movie. If any of its makers were Catholic, they didn't make a big deal of it.
I thought that Bella
was a pretty decent effort. In spite of its flaws (the guy looking like
Jesus being one of them; like Clarence the angel with wings), Bella
demonstrated that Christians can make a movie with style and humor, a
challenge for faiths with ideologies that can include a lot of
strictures such as "You can't say that somebody looks like a whore. In
fact, you can't even say the word 'whore.' You can't make a movie in
New York City either!"
We are a sea change away
from the day when "the Catholic movie" is as widely distributed, seen
and most importantly, as well made, as such movies were sixty and
seventy years ago. Nevertheless, for when and if the sea does change,
here are a few ideas for explicitly and implicitly Catholic movies.
Explicitly Catholic
One explicitly Catholic movie could be about Dante Alighieri and The Divine Comedy. I don't think that The Divine Comedy
itself would be easy to cram into two or three hours of film* and let's
face it, Purgatory and Paradise, the upper regions of Dante's journey
with Virgil, are just not as interesting as Hell.
A manageable and prudent depiction of the genius of Dante's work would be to include bits of his vision in a dramatization of his life in gangland Italy of the Thirteenth/Fourteenth Centuries. Call them Guelphs, Ghibellines, Montecchi, Capelletti, Dante's fellow political actors were what we call "the mob." Dante wrote his epic poem while he was on the lam from Florence where a contract had been put out on him. A lot of the characters in his poem were real guys who had gotten hit.
Too bad Martin Scorcese won't will still be alive if the project comes together.
We certainly don't need another movie about St. Francis, but we could
use one about St.Thomas Aquinas. Yes, Thomas' was largely a life of the
mind, but not without its drama, especially in his youth.
A
fat kid who was thought to be stupid by his schoolmates, he was also
blessed with a gangster family who didn't want him to be a common
priest. The D'Aquinos would have been OK with Thomas as a bishop, that
is, a simoniac who is a clergyman for the money, power and mistresses,
but when their chubby son indicated a desire to join St. Dominic's new
and serious order of preachers, they locked him in his room, which
happened to be in a castle tower.
Thomas'
brothers also released a whore in the room to distract him from his
vocation. He drove her out with a torch and then escaped by shinnying
down the side of the tower by a rope.
Call such a movie Growing Up D'Aquino.
It could be a good zing at those Catholic families who oppose their
sons' or daughters' vocations to religious life. Catholic movies should
often remind Catholics that they are the biggest obstacles in the path
of The Pilgrim Church.
Implicitly Catholic
In the implicitly Catholic film department let's have a faithful dramatization of The Children of Men,
a very relevant story these days when, after decades of contraception
and anti-family behaviors, the problem of depopulation is rearing. In a
few decades, China is expected to have a severe shortage of women and a
couple billion horny, aggressive men.
The
2006 film adaptation of P.D. James' novel was, unfortunately, what we
can expect from establishment filmmakers, that is, people who are
sympathetic to big-brother government and The Culture of Death.
State-assisted
"suicide" drownings were not depicted in the film nor was the ludicrous
pursuit of producing genetically "perfect" babies in a world where no
woman has had a baby of any grade in 25 years. In the movie, "The
Fishes" were portrayed as a somewhat sinister group; in the book
they're the Christian heroes.
None
of Baroness James' hints as to why people have lost the ability to
reproduce made it into the script either. If sex is only for
recreation, those who can't provide maximum recreation are rejected and
interest and ability are eventually lost. Also, if the dwindling number
of children are spoiled little savages, who wants to bring more into
the world?
An attack on the pretension and snobbery of the upwardly mobile that only British Islanders can launch, Hatter's Castle,*
the 1930 novel by Archibald Joseph Cronin is about a family of
self-centered pricks whose middle-class-sized house pretensiously
resembles a castle. The prickiest of the Brodies is the father, a
hat-shop proprietor who, when he is not being obsessively conscious of
a status that he does not possess, is a maestro at verbal,
psychological and threatened physical abuse. Only one member of his
family escapes to become a decent, happy person.
Hatter's Castle
is set around 1880--and includes an actual special effects event, the
Tay Bridge train wreck-- but this is a story that could easily be
adapted to modern times. Catholic parishes in affluent suburbs are full
of families more or less like the Brodies. Let's see: James could be
the owner of a surgical supply company. Instead of having a castle, the
contemporary Brodies have a wine "cave" in their backyard. Their
daughters are on the path to becoming miserable old maids because Mom
and Dad don't think that even senior partners or neurosurgeons are good
enough to marry them. Oh, and one son becomes a priest but he's only
interested in ministering to millionaires.
And we
could never have too many movies based on the stories of Flannery
O'Connor and Evelyn Waugh. O'Connor's novels and short fiction written
in the '50s and early '60s often have the atmosphere and grit seen in
modern movies. And in spite of what Flannery said about her characters
experiencing grace even at the last moment of their lives, her tales
are about bad people getting what they deserve.
Many photoplays of Waugh's work have already been made--Brideshead Revisited being the one people have heard of--but I've only seen one movie that comes close to the spirit of Waugh's books. That was Bright Young Things based on Vile Bodies
and directed by Stephen Fry, a Jewish fella. Those who transfer Waugh's
work to film erroneously highlight his characters' wealth and status
rather than their decadence, spiritual poverty and foolishness.
More to come.
*although, I believe, a movie of Dante's work has been made.
**Hatter's Castle was actually made into a movie, starring the wonderful Robert Newton, back in the '40s.
|